Riddick (2013)


“Survival is his Revenge”*

Directed by David Twohy
Starring Vin Diesel and Katee Sackhoff

First, there was Pitch Black, an ambitious little indy scifi film with scary monsters facing off against a human in the dark, with the implication that this human was more scary, more monstrous, than they were. It featured intriguing concepts and conflicts, and launched the careers of David Twohy and Vin Diesel into the big leagues.

And then came Chronicles of Riddick, in which our monstrous deuteragonist became Space Conan and anyone else who survived the first movie got killed off.

With Chronicles’ less than stellar performance, the third movie in the franchise – simply entitled Riddick – went back to basics. Injured and abandoned by the Necromongers on a desert planet (yay destiny!), Riddick battles his way past mud scorpions and hyaena-jackals to a merc station, from which he hopes to steal a ship belonging to one of the crews who will try to claim the bounty on his head.

Enter Santana (Jordi Molla) and his merry crew of psychopaths and rapists, and a second, more professional crew including Dahl (Sackhoff), token tough gal. Riddick plays cat and mouse to try to force the two crews to leave a ship for him, then gets captured, then teams up with the surviving mercs to escape from a trap which he created and then complicated by a procession of dumb-fuck double-crosses by Santana’s crew.

What’s wrong with it?

Pitch Black had three female characters, and all of them were interesting, strong in their way, and flawed. So were the male characters, even Riddick, who ultimately found that even his invincible stone-cold facade was eventually shattered by the courage that Carolyn Fry (who was the hero of the film, rather than Riddick, before he became the franchise) found throughout the course of the story.

Riddick worked in the first movie because of his relationships with Fry and Jack. In the third movie, he’s mostly working off a CGI dog (although the early scenes with no-one else are actually some of the better ones). He also worked because as powerful and apparently necessary as he was, he wasn’t the hero. The hero was the woman who seemed least likely to fill that role, who started out a coward and grew into someone who would die for others. It was epic.

And that brings us back to female characters. Pitch Black had three solid female roles; Riddick has two female characters, both of them awful.

The first one is a female prisoner, implied to have been repeatedly raped by Santana and his crew, and then murdered after about five lines of dialogue as a means of proving that the really bad guys are worse than any of the other psychopaths in the film. She is never even given a name, but dies within five feet of Riddick as if she is supposed to have an emotional impact equivalent to that of Carolyn Fry.

The second is Dahl (Katee Sackhoff), who is tough. And that’s about it. She gets to punch the rapist guy a few times to prove it, and shoot Riddick with tranquilisers. At worst, she’s a lesbian who turns straight for Riddick ’cause he’s just that manly; at best, she’s an asexual loon who is turned on by extreme psychopathy. I tend towards the latter interpretation, but it’s still not very good.

The male characters are not much better, consisting of a number of essentially indistinguishable support roles – I straight up can not remember which if any of these disposable stereotypes survives – and Santana, whose sole purpose seems to be to cross the morality event horizon so often that it makes you think that Riddick isn’t so bad really, and when you’re supposed to support the protagonist because they just kill people, maim, sexually harass and spy on women in the shower, rather than gratuitously murdering dogs or attempting actual rape, it’s a poor showing.

What’s right with it?

The film is technically impressive, and there is some meat to the early survival sections of the narrative; at least once they’re done with completely ditching the second film.

Diesel turns in a decent performance, but Matthew Nable wins out in the acting stakes, bringing a weighty dignity to the role of Boss Johns which is frankly more than the material deserves. The film also gets points for its resolution which, although somewhat signposted, does run against the obvious prediction.

How bad is it really?

For most of its length, when it’s not being a soul-sucking offense to good taste with its poor female characters, explicit ‘banter’ and gratuitous violence, the film is just kind of humdrum. A bunch of people die nastily, but we don’t care enough for it to have any impact.

Best bit (if such there is)?

Alone on the desert world, Riddick tames a hyaena-jackal to experiment with innoculating against the scorpion venom, slowly building a rapport with the animal. It may just be the best bit because it doesn’t have any of the desperately poor dialogue.

What’s up with…?

  • The proliferation of Deathworlds in this galaxy? If God created Arrakis to test the faithful, he must have created this corner of the universe to seriously fuck off the doubting.
  • Santana’s prisoner? Did we really need that to convince us that Santana was a bad-un? For a moment I thought she might be some sort of bad ass who would team up with Riddick and provide the movie’s counterpoint to his growling cynicism, but it turned out that they had neither plans for her nor any feeling that there needed to be a counterpoint.


Production values – David Twohy is a little too fond of using filters to break his films into ‘zones’, either of time or of space. In this instance, burning orange for the desert and blue-black beneath the storm. Other than that, however, the production is pretty top notch, with hero-jackal having at least as much personality as some of the humans in the film. 6
Dialogue and performances –  The bulk of the performances in the film are pretty terrible, with a special note for Katee Sackhoff, whose approach to playing a violent psychopath is just to grin lopsidedly at everything as though it was super funny. In defence of the players, however, there really isn’t much to be done with the material, which is mostly just technobabble or horrible, gut-churning innuendo and single entendre. 17
Plot and execution – The plot of Riddick is impressive, because it is as simple as Pitch Black‘s, and yet somehow is still mangled all to hell as though it were too complex for its running time. 16
Randomness – The film is, for the most part, internally consistent. However, where it fails is in aligning with the preceeding chapters, ignoring Riddick’s redemption/rebirth story from the first film and deliberately undoing the destiny/transcendence bit from the second (although the extended version shows that this film was merely an interlude before going back to the Necromongers and the Underverse.
Joy. 13
Waste of potential – Pitch Black was an excellent film; a scifi horror action movie that hit all its cues and even passes the Bechdel test. How the same team go from that to this offensive pile of crap I do not know. 19

Overall 71%

* Actually, revenge is pretty much his revenge.


4 thoughts on “Riddick (2013)”

  1. Why are you (and some more people) so convinced Dahl was a lesbian? She might say it just to piss of Santana and get rid of unwanted sex offers from men in general – her own team mates (because she is professional and doesn´t want to mess her carrier with unneccessary problems) and from anyone of the other team of mercs. I don´t usualy like female kick-ass wannabes in the movies but Dahl wasn´t wannabe. I believed she is really a merc pro, not an actress who pretends to be one. She doesn´t wear retarded whore outfit (Hell, Harley Quinn!) like the most of female characters in movies todays and is generally cool.
    Thit part: “she’s an asexual loon who is turned on by extreme psychopathy” really hit me because I´m asexual (gray-A specifically) and Riddick is hotter then Crematoria on the day side for me. I just don´t agree with extreme psychopathy diagnosis. Extreme psychopaths are unable to form any emotional bond to anyone (I know one of those bussiness type psychos and he´s the biggest turn off for me), which isn´t true for Riddick. He obviously cared about Jack-Kyra, his alien dog-like animal, he felt sorry for Fry when she was killed by flying alien creature…This is not extreme psychopathy, more likely he has psychopathic tendencies but considering his life (the first time when someone tried to kill him was just when he was born – a lovely start of life, really!) it might have something to do with big emotional trauma too. Anyone living half of his life in various horrible prisons in the galaxy would either die or become pretty unsensitive and cynical.
    I have also borderline personality disorder (attraction to people with psychopathic tendencies is nothing special in borderliners) and cynical point of view on the world – Riddick´s quotes: “There are bad days and there are legendary bad days” or “It can end up only bad if you let someone get close to you. Bad for them.” sum up my life pretty well. I would even go so far to say he´s the only true soulmate I has ever had. Too bad he´s fictional.

    1. Thank you for your comments. I’d like to begin by apologising for my language in the review. It was only written three years ago, but already there are phrases that I wouldn’t have used today.

      ‘Lesbian turned straight’ was essentially the worst possible construction of the situation, while asexual and loon were not intended to be considered as a unit, but as two separate traits contributing to an outcome, and again I apologise for my sloppy use of language.

      My main issue within the film is that Dahl’s uncharacteristic willingness to display attraction is apparently elicited not by Riddick’s inner self, but by the psychopathic affects that he displays to the world. We as the audience see his devotion to Jack, we see him pet the dog, we see him recognise that Fry was better than him. Most of the characters in the movie don’t. I’ll be honest, I can’t say for sure if Dahl had a chance at that insight, because it’s been three and a half years since I saw the movie, but at the time it struck me that he wasn’t presenting as much different to the merc men she despised; she just gave him a pass because he’s the main character. I could be wrong about that.

      Thinking back, I don’t think it was as bad as my knee-jerk reaction made it, but then I like Diesel and Sackhoff as actors, so in my memory I may have reconstructed the scenes in a more positive light. I admit that I had high expectations of this film, in spite of Chronicles of Riddick, and I was angry disappointed when I wrote the review.

      1. Thank for your reply too.
        Hey, asexual turning hetero is as bad as lesbian turning hetero, if we talk about 100% asexuals. It would insult them the same way how it would insult lesbians because people just don´t magicaly change their sexual orientation.
        But we don´t know if Dahl was hetero-, homo-, bi- or asexual. All we know is she said: “I don´t fuck guys but I fuck up them if they need it.” (sorry for possibly incorrect words, English isn´t my mother tongue) And her words can be interpreted in several ways:
        1) she´s lesbian
        2) she claims to be lesbian to get rid of unwanted attention, which is smart in male dominated industry, like working as bounty hunter in cynical post-apo galaxy
        3) she doesn´t “fuck” but she “makes love”. This third interpretation came to my mind just now. There are people who don´t “fuck” aka don´t have casual sex with everyone. There must be something more for them. It´s not very likely that Dahl could feel something more for Riddick because she barely had a chance to know him


        we don´t even know if they really had sex. Considering Riddick´s injury and presence of other mercs in the ship, it´s not very likely. So Dahl could be just joking because she knows no sex will gonna happen.

        Which all leads me to interesting theory about Riddick: he easily could be asexual. There´s not a single scene of him having sex with anyone, despite Jack-Kyra´s unhealthy obsession with him and Dame Vaako throwing herself on him (Vaako´s obvious temptation to kill Riddick with an axe is priceless in that moment 😀 ) and his Necrowhores he has as Lord Marshal who want him in the bed but he looks totally uninterested.
        It´s quite weird there are no scene of Riddick having sex with some women in the movies which are mostly R-rated and full of violent scenes. Almost every movie todays has some typically pointless sex scenes just to have them. There would be no problem to include scenes of Riddick fu.king women like an animal, when the movies even describe him like an animal (primitive animal side, Furyan side) and ultimate alpha male. Unless there´s a deeper reason for it and that reason might be he is asexual. Which would be cool for me as 99% asexual but ironical as Hell too because when I finally do find someone sexy he is asexual, so he wouldn´t have sex with me even if he wasn´t fictional. WTF? That´s Riddickulous!!!

      2. I suspect that this comment constitutes more actual thought on the character of Riddick than the writers of either this film or Chronicles put in.

        You know… I wonder if part of what sat wrong about this relationship wasn’t that Riddick being sexual to any notable degree rang false.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s